A Deep Dive on Air Mail Envelope Design
We all know what an air mail envelope looks like — or do we?
A few weeks ago I did a deep dive on “Return to Sender” symbols used by the Postal Service. One of the comments on that article came from IC reader Brendan Jang, who wrote, “Hoping for a similar piece on air mail envelope design!”
Of course, I was already familiar with the basic air mail envelope, with its border pattern of red and blue parallelograms (like the 1944 example shown above). But just as it hadn’t occurred to me that there might be myriad variations on the “Return to Sender” pointing hand, it likewise hadn’t dawned on me that air mail envelopes might be a deep well of design diversity. I had intuitively assumed — very incorrectly, as it turns out — that they were all the same.
So at Brendan’s suggestion, I started a journey down this new rabbit hole. One thing I quickly learned is that the classic air mail envelope design is actually patented! The design was created by a Buffalo stationer named Benjamin Dahlke, who applied for a patent in 1927. It was granted to him in 1929.
According to Dahlke’s patent application:
[The parallelogram pattern] immediately attracts the eye and serves as a flash or signal, facilitating the duty of giving such mail the special attention required of mail clerks and ensuring the quick and prompt delivery to which such mail is entitled. Furthermore, by carrying this characteristic border around the edges of the envelope, it can be readily detected in a pile, bundle, or stack of miscellaneous envelopes, thereby materially aiding in the quick assortment of air mail, or other special mail.
This design has become informally known as the Dahlke envelope. Although Dahlke’s patent wasn’t granted until 1929, the U.S. Post Office Department approved the use of his design in the spring of 1928. As a result, the earliest known examples of the Dahlke envelope are from 1928. Some of them were manufactured by Dahlke himself and sold at his stationery shop; others were made and sold by other stationers.
Almost immediately, there were design inconsistencies. For example, some envelopes didn’t have the border pattern along the top edge (similar to Dahlke’s patent drawing), while others had an uninterrupted pattern going all the way around the envelope.
The relative size and spacing of the parallelograms also varied widely. Some border patterns included a lot of white space, while others were more densely packed.
Most surprisingly, at least to me, some of these 1928 covers had the parallelograms leaning in the “wrong” direction!